| Parking at Belvedere - How many people are for this? I recently wrote an article in letters to the Editor about The parking lot that Belvedere owns across the road from the residence. The proposal I saw Which was rejected was really nice for ALL to enjoy..Take a ride down there please & vote accordingly Thanks Mary-Lou VOLUNTEER |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Posted By | Start DD/MM/YY |
Finish DD/MM/YY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mary-Lou Herbert | 28/05/09 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Date/Time | Vote | By | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/01/10 | No | baystick | You refer to the "property" across from the seniors residence as a parking lot. Since when? It was never, and should never be a parking lot. It is one of the most beautiful look out points anywhere, and should be preserved for that purpose only!!! |
| 05/01/10 | No | geogian pines | |
| 10/10/09 | Yes | Doug | Let's see...They own the property...They have an aknowledged parkling problem...The proposed lot will not obstruct the view..this is private land...tell the town to back off and pave it |
| 23/08/09 | No | Sue | Town made it a heritage site. When will you get it through your head that it's not supposed to be, nor should it be a parking lot. Leave it alone!!! If there aren't enough parking spots for Belvedere then maybe the original planners are to blame. |
| 21/08/09 | Yes | Resident | They should make the whole road structure up there into a massive parking lot, but leave the greenspace untouched! You cannot really call it a throughway the way it is operated now, so may as well pave the top of the hill leaving the lower part natural |
| 07/06/09 | No | Nature Al | More parking means more traffic which will degrade the natural surroundings. Leave it be! Walk there, it's healthier... |
| 30/05/09 | Yes | Mary-Lou | |
| 28/05/09 | No | Not interested | Leave it natural... it's WHY people come here! |
